A smart-home brand was exporting household robot vacuums (with charging dock) from Shenzhen to Europe. Each vacuum contained a built-in lithium-ion battery. The client had prepared their own SDS, UN38.3 test report, and transport condition report.
The consignment name on all documents was "Lithium-ion Cell" — not "Robot Vacuum." The shipping line could not verify whether a cell-level SDS applied to the complete appliance. The discrepancy between the declared product and the actual shipment triggered automatic rejection.
| What the client had | What the client needed |
|---|---|
| SDS for battery cell only | SDS for complete equipment (robot vacuum with battery) |
| UN38.3 report referencing the cell | UN38.3 report with a conformity statement linking it to the appliance |
| Documents addressing UN3480 (lithium batteries, standalone) | Documents addressing UN3481 (lithium batteries contained in equipment) |
UN3480 vs UN3481 — the critical distinction:
We asked the client for the complete appliance specification sheet (including battery parameters), then reissued every document with "Robot Vacuum (with Lithium-ion Battery)" as the consignment name:
The consignment name on every transport document must match the actual product being shipped. A battery-cell SDS cannot cover an appliance containing that battery. This is the single most common document error in lithium battery exports — and the easiest to fix when caught early.